Ergonomía 4. El trabajo en oficinas. Front Cover. Pedro R. Mondelo, Enrique Gregori Torada, Oscar De Pedro González, Miguel A. Gómez Fernández. Ergonomia 4 by Pedro R. Mondelo at – ISBN – ISBN – Alfaomega Grupo Editor – – Softcover. Results 1 – 30 of 47 ERGONOMÍA 2 by Pedro R. Mondelo and a great selection of related books, art and Ergonomia 4 (Spanish Edition): Mondelo, Pedro R.

Author: Kakasa Dilrajas
Country: Belize
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 27 September 2018
Pages: 206
PDF File Size: 11.21 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.54 Mb
ISBN: 262-8-94561-648-2
Downloads: 86637
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akinozuru

AuditERGO: a software for the ergonomic assessment of workplaces

London and Philadelphia Barcelona Applied ergonomics handbook Galer, I. London and Philadelphia Techniques of safety management Petersen, D. Finally, it comes to a conclusion that the Didactic TOOL pedto noteworthy for its purpose, generating interest to the student and the academic community because of its research support in the area.

For a further study of a work place, a qualified technician is required. Then, every time you evaluate certain aspects of a workplace, this screen changes, and it becomes a resume of the workplace state. It also gives recommendations about each subject dealt with. After the analysis of such problematic, the proposal of a TOOL is justified, so that students may learn about the ergonomic aspects of their seat designs.

When a factor is selected, then appears a screen, depending on the factor that has been clicked, which permits you to assess aspects more concretes of the frgonomia. Editor responsible for updating this issue: As a part of the Industrial Design program at the UDLSB, the subject of Furniture Design attempts to involve students into general problematics concerned to the furniture area, without looking for a strict specialization in each study case.

Secondly, AuditERGO represents a good reference in ergonomics, because there is much theoretical content in it. For example, if you see figure 4, you can see that this worker has some problems that must be corrected urgently in physical workload. We are aware of these limitations since this program has been conceived to help ergonomics peedro every simple workplace.


After this step you will find the business data. Safety includes all those aspects that can lead to an accident or momdelo incident white accident ,or that can be related to them.

It is possible to predict some specific circumstances that can lead to serious accidents.

In this section, several psychosocial mojdelo closely related to the way the work is organised are included. The first step is where it requires the name of the working centre and the password; AuditERGO permits to assess different workplaces that pertain to different business. The last part when running the program is to print or view on the screen the final inform. A design manual Clark, T. How to cite item. It is obvious, even when an age, sex or ethnic homogenous group is taken, that human beings are different in shapes and in body monxelo.

Lomas del Campestre, C. Diagonal, planta Barcelona, Spain llimona oe.

Email this article Login required. This program is a good tool to help the worker himself ergoonomia someone else to assess a workplace. These circumstances may be presented by taking into account the conditions under which they occur, and by designing workplaces correctly, instead of trying to reduce accident frequency or damage.

At this point, we have the main screen of the worker figure 3. The organisation will be analysed through the relationship of the worker with the rest of the employees, and the working pedfo, timetable, eating habits, etc.

Focus on aesthetics and comfort! Email the author Login required. Copyright for exclusive use No. Article Tools Print this article.

Anthropometry, 44 and the design of the work Pheasant, S. It does not publish reviews, bibliographical revisions, or professional pesro. The third phase helped determinate the correct methodology errgonomia to assign projects to the students, leading up to the establishment of a main study case under the category of seating furniture.

With the results of the case in matter, the mechanics of the product-user relationship were analyzed and according to these, previous adjustments were recommended for a definite prototype, warning to prevent health risks due to a bad posture caused by an ergonomic deficiency in its design. This process was followed by students, who had broadened their knowledge in that matter.


London and Philadelphia Salud Laboral.

Biomecánica con fundamentos de la técnica deportiva – Dmitri Dmitrievich Donskoi – Google Books

At this point you have the option, if you detect any mistake in the data entered or simply if you want to update it, to make some changes. Most of software designed to evaluate workplace conditions can only be used by experts. On the top of the screen you can see the name of ergomomia factor and the specific item that you are studying, and the name of the worker, which appears in every screen.

In this section five factors will be analysed:.

This problem requires a previous evaluation of the workplace if we want to adapt the workplace to the person or group of persons that are going to spend the working day there. In this section five factors will be analysed: The organisation will be analysed through the relationship of the worker with the rest of the employees, and the working rhythms, timetable, eating habits, etc SAFETY Safety includes all those aspects that can lead to an accident or an incident white accident ,or that can be related to them.

The present research contemplated four phases in general. User Username Password Remember me. These four main factors user, organisation, safety and environment represent the first step in the evaluation of a workplace.

The idea of this screen is the same of the last one, in a moment you can have an idea of how the situation ofthe workplace is. Inside the coloured squares, it also gives you the number of questions that have been answered negatively by the worker, in front of the total each factor has.